Part of this comprehension includes the ability to recognize a logical fallacy in an argument. The understanding of logical fallacies will help one become a better critical thinker by enabling them to break apart an argument from an opponent and debate the argument by pointing out the flaws. In this paper I will be discussing the Straw Man fallacy, the Red Herring Fallacy, and the Weak Analogy fallacy and how they relate to critical thinking.
Part of this comprehension includes the ability to recognize a logical fallacy in an argument. The understanding of logical fallacies will help one become a better critical thinker by enabling them to break apart an argument from an opponent and debate the argument by pointing out Logical fallacies summary and application essay flaws.
In this paper I will be discussing the Straw Man fallacy, the Red Herring Fallacy, and the Weak Analogy fallacy and how they relate to critical thinking. One must understand what an argument is and how it is constructed to understand when and why a logical fallacy is used.
As defined in by Bassham et al"Arguments are composed of one or more premises and a conclusion. Premises are statements that are claimed to provide evidence for another statement, the conclusion.
The conclusion is the statement that the premises are claimed to prove or support" p. When an argument has flawed logic it would be considered to have a logical fallacy. The use of a logical fallacy might be to distract someone from understanding the true issue of an argument, or it might be used because the arguer is has an imperfect argument.
The first logical fallacy we will look at is the Straw Man fallacy. This fallacy is when the argument "misrepresents a person or groups position in order to make that position easier to attack. Then I stated that Oscar Mayer makes the best bologna, so the opinion of the butcher having better hotdogs is not true.
The understanding of how the Straw Man fallacy is used will allow one to recognize when it is used in an argument.
This understanding will also permit a critical thinker to evaluate the argument and determine if the argument is solid or not. This would become useful in analyzing a problem correctly by identifying any hidden causes to a problem. Once one understands the straw man fallacy and can recognize its use in an argument then he or she can make a more informed decision.
It is possible for one to have a straw man fallacy while working in a team environment. While weighing all the solutions for a problem it is possible for a team member to use this flawed logic and make a statement that contains a straw man fallacy.
This could cause the team to obtain an incorrect solution if the fallacy is not recognized. I and an instance at work where I had recognized a design flaw in a smoke purge system for a building.
I went to the mechanical coordinator of the general contractor and explained what the issue was and what should be done to fix the issue. At the weekly construction meeting my manager asked what was the status of the decision to fix the issue I had brought up.
He was told that the engineer who designed the system had a creditable background in engineering and that I was only a technician so I had no idea about what I was speaking of.
The issue was not resolved till testing of the smoke purge system was done and the design flaw I found was proven.
The general contractor then issued a change to fix the situation. The rework of the system cost the general contractor more then if the issue was fixed when I mentioned it.
How does President Bush plan to pay for this risky scheme you ask. The straw man fallacy here is that nowhere in the Presidents agenda on Social Security reform has he said that he would do any of what the DNC has put out in the commercial.
A similar fallacy to the straw man fallacy is the red herring fallacy.
The red herring fallacy occurs when a person "attempts to sidetrack an audience by raising an irrelevant issue and then claiming that the original issue has been effectively settled by the irrelevant diversion.An article that uses a logical fallacy in its argument Short Paper: Due Friday 9/23 For this short paper you are to find an article on an online newspaper that uses a logical fallacy in.
A synthesis essay requires the usage of unique parts to create a whole idea. A key factor of writing such essays is an analysis of a given text or a prompt. A synthesis essay is about mixing several ideas to defend the thesis.
Identify Logical Fallacies in a Text Write my research paper Question description Click link to read Mark Twain’s essay “The Late Benjamin Franklin” Resource: Twain, M. . Fallacy Summary and Application Paper Trista L.
Fossa University of Phoenix MGT James Bailey, Jr. February 9, Fallacy Summary and Application Paper “A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed, essentially rendering the line of reasoning, if not the entire argument, invalid.
Describe yourself essay for college livechart analysis essay rutgers admissions essay christmas is the most wonderful time of the year essay my wonderful childhood memory essay essays for peace corps application stress and health psychology essay bitesize scottish higher history essay nicole frindt dissertation meaning logical fallacies in gay.
Advertisement analysis essay yellow essay about giving volleyball in telugu example classification essay writing healthy diet martin eden essay of manchester united the beach essay joke, tennis summary essay non fiction essay jakarta favorite writing essay structure application sample essay uf.